-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement proper SSSOM validation #32
Conversation
This commit adds
should we also add metadata for mondo?
|
You mean because of the "unknowns"? In this case, make a MONDO issue about it - they should fix it! |
ah. no, i didn't even notice the "unknowns". I just meant that #30 seemed to want |
Mondo already has it, right, so no need to add another one? |
You have merged this but qc was failing! (Because sssom py cannot process gene_mappings). In any case @hrshdhgd is trying profile the validation run to figure out |
reverted |
It's fine to merge the PR, in any case nothing was more broken afterwards then it was before.. it was just a general warning not to merge stuff if qc fails |
Are you making a new PR? |
as of this commit, f589a59 the tests were passing, at least as far as i can tell? |
Trying to, but git doesn't seem to think there's any changes between this branch and main anymore, so I'm not sure. |
Huh whaaaa?? Sorry man. Seems all good then! I didn't get a message it's all fixed! |
You may have to revert the revert |
The QC passes but it still took 50 mins to pass. |
No it definetly had sssom installed, as it finished the pipeline parts before that - but maybe an older version? |
I set up locally from scratch and |
Don't revert anything. I will make a new PR if need be. |
Please don't lose all my changes 😅 thanks |
haha don't worry. Nothing will be lost. |
Fixes #30 and #31